Skip to main content
All Articles
GEO

Why Your Marketing Agency Hasn't Told You About GEO Yet — And What It's Costing You

Most agencies aren't hiding GEO out of malice — they're avoiding it because it doesn't fit their reporting, retainers, or skill set. Here's what to ask, and what it's costing you while you wait.

Renato Dequincis 4 min read

If you’ve asked your agency about ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google’s AI Overviews and gotten a vague answer — “we’re keeping an eye on it,” “it’s still early” — you’re not imagining the dodge. Most marketing agencies genuinely aren’t ready to talk about Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO), and it’s rarely because they’re hiding something malicious. It’s because GEO doesn’t fit neatly into how most agencies are built to operate — and that gap is quietly costing their clients visibility right now.

The real reason most agencies stay quiet

It isn’t a conspiracy. It’s structural.

Their reporting doesn’t have a column for it. Most agency dashboards are built around rank tracking — position #1 through #10 for a list of keywords. AI citation doesn’t work that way: there’s no fixed “position,” often no list at all, just a mention or an omission inside a generated answer. An agency whose entire client-reporting workflow is built on rank-tracking screenshots has no easy way to show GEO progress, so it’s easier to not bring it up.

It requires a different skill set. Content writers and paid media buyers — the bulk of most agency teams — don’t typically implement schema markup, audit entity clarity, or restructure content for machine extraction. That’s closer to technical SEO and structured-data engineering. Plenty of agencies simply don’t have anyone in-house who’s done this work.

It complicates the retainer conversation. GEO work — audits, schema, entity mapping, ongoing citation monitoring — doesn’t map cleanly onto “10 blog posts a month” or “20 hours of ad management.” Selling it means restructuring the retainer, which is friction most agencies would rather avoid until a client forces the issue.

None of this means GEO isn’t real or important. It means the businesses currently doing it are the ones who asked first, or who chose an agency that built the capability deliberately rather than reactively.

What it’s actually costing you to wait

This isn’t a hypothetical opportunity cost. The shift in where people start their research is already measurable: more than a third of consumers now say they start searches in an AI tool like ChatGPT instead of going straight to Google, and AI search tools collectively see hundreds of millions of weekly users. That’s not a future trend to prepare for — it’s a current, sizeable share of the research and buying journey that’s already happening without your input, if you’re not part of the answer.

The specific cost compounds quietly:

  • Every AI answer that recommends a competitor instead of you is a lead that never reaches your website, your ads, or your sales team at all — it’s foreclosed before the funnel even starts.
  • Every month without clear entity and schema signals is a month an AI system might be guessing at, or misdescribing, what your business actually does.
  • Every competitor who starts GEO work before you gets a head start on the same compounding advantage traditional SEO rewarded early movers with in the 2000s and 2010s — except the field is far less crowded right now, which makes the first-mover advantage larger, not smaller.

None of this shows up on a traditional rank-tracking report. That’s exactly the problem.

What to ask your current agency

You don’t need to become a GEO expert to have this conversation. Ask directly:

  1. “What are you doing to get us cited in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity answers?” — A specific answer beats a reassuring one.
  2. “Have you implemented schema markup built for AI parsing, not just traditional SEO?” — Organization, Service, FAQPage and Article schema, specifically.
  3. “How do you measure AI citation, separately from search rankings?” — If the answer is “we don’t track that yet,” that’s an honest, useful data point.
  4. “Is our entity — what AI systems understand our business to be — clear and consistent everywhere you can check?”

A good agency will have real, specific answers, or will honestly say they’re building the capability. Vague reassurance is the signal to look elsewhere.

How we approach it differently

GEO at doubleBaRRiL isn’t a bolt-on service pitched after a client asks — it runs through the same technical SEO foundation, schema implementation, and content restructuring work as everything else we do, because that’s the only way it actually works. We don’t sell it as a magic fix, and we don’t promise guaranteed citations — nobody controls how ChatGPT or Perplexity weigh a source. What we do commit to is the audit, the implementation, and honest reporting on what’s actually changing.

If you want a concrete, free read on where your business currently stands — not a sales pitch, an actual test — run our GEO Readiness Quiz or the AI Visibility Checker. Either takes a few minutes and tells you exactly where the gap is.

If you’re ready to talk specifics, get in touch — and if your current agency ever gives you a straight answer to the four questions above, that’s a genuinely good sign to stay put.

Frequently asked questions

1 Why haven't more agencies started offering GEO?

Mostly because it doesn't fit their existing model — it requires technical schema and entity work most content-and-ads shops don't have in-house, and it's harder to report on with the rank-tracking dashboards clients are used to. It's a genuine skills and tooling gap, not usually deliberate concealment.

2 Is GEO just a rebrand of SEO?

No. Traditional SEO earns a ranked position on a search results page. GEO earns a citation or mention inside an AI-generated answer, which draws on different signals — entity clarity, schema, and answer-first content — even though strong technical SEO is part of the foundation both depend on.

3 What should I ask my current agency about GEO?

Ask them directly what they're doing to get you cited in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity answers, whether they've implemented schema markup for AI parsing specifically, and how they measure AI citation rather than just search rankings. A clear, specific answer is a good sign; a vague one is worth pressing on.

#GEO #Generative Engine Optimization #AI search #marketing agencies #South Africa

Take the next step

Ready to Apply These Insights?

Get a free technical audit of your current digital acquisition stack.

Start Your Free Audit →
Book a 15-Minute Strategy Call →